Management is not “one-size-fits-all.” Many different types of managerial styles exist.
The autocratic or authoritative manager is probably the least popular. Many times, this manager only says something to his employees when something is wrong. As a result, he is often considered difficult to communicate with and can be perceived as imposing or domineering. Another characteristic of the autocratic manager is the felt need to control all aspects of a department rather than relying on subordinates to carry out tasks autonomously. He also tends to prefer blunt and direct communication.
The developmental or consensus-based manager, on the other hand, is often well-respected for his tolerance and open-mindedness. His employees consider him approachable on most any issue and understand that he will consider ideas that sometimes are in disagreement with his own. The developmental manager typically relies heavily on coaching and feedback to foster a trusting work environment. This does not mean, necessarily, that he is a pushover, but rather that he carefully chooses when and where to assert his authority.
Depending on the situation the company is in, it may not be best to be either autocratic or developmental in management style. Instead, a combination of the two may be a better fit. Too often, in their approach to soften their communication, developmental managers can fail to get their messages across. Authoritative managers get their message across, but can do so in a damaging and demeaning way, often squelching enthusiasm. A blend of the two results in carefully worded yet direct communication with employees.