Health information technology (HIT) is a hot topic in both medical and political spheres of influence. The reasons are clear about why the medical industry is embracing HIT as quickly as it can in order to improve safety, quality and efficiency of medical care. But why do governments care? A couple of reasons emerge: first of all, HIT can be expensive to introduce to a paper-using medical setting. Going paperless, as it is called when a hospital or clinic adopts a system of information technology in the medical setting, is costly because it requires: a high up front cost on computer equipment, software, and training and not to mention—the hours and hours of work taking information from paper charts and entering it into computerized ones. Another problem with the emergence of HIT is that many systems aren’t very compatible. Governments realize that potential problems may occur down the road if France and Australia can’t share medical data easily. It may not be such a big deal in an isolated medical event, but on the minds of healthcare officials is certainly the big one—a worldwide pandemic. In the meantime, much effort is being made—however more slowly in some corners of the world than others—to introduce and enhance the use of health information technology in the quest to better medical care and the overall health of individuals and communities alike.